All there is, is this immediacy. This expression is clearly not a message.
What is expressed here isn`t for anyone, because there is no recognition here, that there is something called a separate individual. As such what is expressed here is the natural rejection of all forms of dualism, teacher, teaching and ideas of truth and becoming.
So this expression is not satsang at all.
It is not spiritual and doesn’t offer anything because this, is already all there is. There is nothing to find or offer and no-one to offer anything. This expression doesn’t matter at all. It isn’t important if it is heard or not and it isn’t a “teaching of non-teaching” as that too would be another teaching!
This, is really pointless, its not useful in anyway. The apparent me-state is energy caught in the illusion of seeking fullfilment. Seeking apparently veils what is, aliveness, wonder, newness or enoughness, with a sense of personal separateness giving rise to a sense of dis-content. There is no fullfilment of this dis-content, there is just relief from this arduous task.
The hopeless irelavance of seeking, inevitably and naturally falls away. This is the end of the apparent seeker or questioner. This is the end of time, this is the end of the knower. That which is longed for is already this. What is, was never fractured, fracturedness was just hallucination. All there is, is unknowable aliveness, newness, all there is, is this immediacy.
